Skip to main content

Bible, business, wealth and stewardship

Hiring is a moral act

We talk about business ethics as though it were mainly about honesty in transactions. The heavier moral weight sits in the offer letter.

Voice of Generations Editorial6 min read

A founder decides to hire. Somewhere, a person's rent becomes payable, a family decides whether to move, a child's school is chosen, a plan is made that assumes this income continues.

None of that appears in the hiring process. What appears is a role, a budget, a shortlist and a start date. But the founder has just taken a position of real power over someone's material life, and in most Christian business teaching this passes without comment.

What the employer actually controls

Four things, none of them small.

Whether the household is stable. Not just the salary, but its predictability. A job that pays well and might vanish without notice is a different proposition from one that pays less and does not.

Whether the work is worth the week. A person will spend more waking hours on this than on their children. Whether those hours are wasted is largely the employer's decision, not the employee's.

Whether the person leaves better. After three years, is this person more capable, more employable, more confident — or have they been used efficiently and returned unchanged?

How they are treated when they are of no further use. Redundancy, illness, a role that no longer fits. This is where an employer's actual convictions become visible, because it is the only point at which behaving well costs something and buys nothing.

The convenient framings

Two ideas do a lot of work in letting employers avoid this, and both sound reasonable.

"The market sets the price." It sets a range. Within that range someone decides, and the decision is not made by the market. An employer who pays at the bottom of a range because they can is making a choice and attributing it to an abstraction.

"We're a family here." Usually deployed to extract commitment that is not being reciprocated. Families do not make members redundant by email. If the language of family is used upward — asking for loyalty, flexibility, unpaid extra — but not downward when the accounts are tight, it is not a description, it is a technique.

Four practical tests

Could you explain this person's pay to them, in full, without discomfort? Including how it compares to the person beside them and to what you take yourself.

Do you know what a bad month costs this household? Not their salary — their exposure. An employer who has no idea whether an employee is two weeks from difficulty is making decisions blind.

When you last let someone go, what did you do beyond the legal minimum? The legal minimum is a floor built for the worst employer in the market. Meeting it is not an achievement.

Would your junior staff describe your business the same way you do? They will answer honestly to someone, just not to you. That answer is the real one.

The wider chain

The same logic runs outward. A supplier paid at ninety days is financing your business from their household. A contractor priced down because they have no alternative is subsidising your margin with their insecurity. Neither is illegal, both are ordinary, and both are decisions somebody makes.

None of this argues against commercial discipline. A business that cannot pay its way employs nobody, and sentimentality that bankrupts a firm has harmed every household depending on it. Rigour is part of the obligation, not opposed to it.

Why this belongs in formation

Because it is where a leader's convictions get tested at the resolution that matters. It is easy to hold a view about the dignity of work in the abstract. It is harder to hold it in a budget meeting where a headcount line would balance the quarter.

We teach this early, before the material on capital and investment, for the same reason we teach value creation before generosity: the decisions that shape most people's lives are made upstream of the ones that get discussed.

This article is general education about business ethics and employment practice. It is not legal, employment, financial or tax advice, and it does not take account of your circumstances or your jurisdiction. Take advice from an appropriately qualified professional before acting on anything you read here.

Topic
Bible, business, wealth and stewardship
Review status
Approved by Dr Olusanya Olumide Adeniran
Owner
Programme and formation

Bible, business, wealth and stewardship

Value creation is the first ethical question

Most Christian conversation about business starts at generosity. It should start two steps earlier, with whether the thing being sold is worth what is charged for it.

Voice of Generations Editorial7 min read

Bible, business, wealth and stewardship

Debt is not a character flaw

Telling someone in difficulty that they need better discipline is usually both wrong and expensive. Here is what the evidence and the arithmetic suggest instead.

Voice of Generations Editorial7 min read